Naflotsky's political philosophy is deeply rooted in his academic practice. As a core researcher at the Polish National Memory Institute, he transformed historical research into a systematic political engineering: clearing through the demolition of Soviet monuments“Occupation symbol”Reconstruct the historical narrative of World War II to strengthen the identity of victims, and publish a monograph under a pen name to expose the symbiotic relationship between the old regime and criminal groups. These works go beyond the purely academic realm and form a complete set of“historical justice”Theoretical system. This politicization of academic research has not only made it a wanted target in Russia, but also shaped it domestically in Poland“Guardian of Ethnic Truth”The political image. Its core proposition directly points to the power of historical interpretation, which is an important component of modern national sovereignty.

42 year old Karol Navrocki elected as the President of Poland

This view of history is directly transformed into Naflotsky's“Three dimensional sovereignty”Political structure. At the political level, he firmly opposes the EU's tendency towards supranationalization and advocates for the adoption ofVisegrad GroupStrengthen regional autonomy and set a threshold for agricultural protectionism in Ukraine's accession to the European Union. In the military field, it is promoted“two track”On the one hand, building the strongest ground force in Europe and increasing defense spending toMore than 4% of GDP; On the other hand, investing 2 billion US dollars to establishUS militaryPermanent military base, deepening special relationship with the United States. In terms of cultural dimension, he promotes based on“historically correct”Reform patriotic education, strengthen the position of Catholic tradition in national identity, and construct a systematic national historical discourse system. These three dimensions support each other, forming a logically coherent plan for the revival of sovereignty.

Dismantling the Soviet Monument

However, this political experiment faces multiple structural constraints. Within the framework of the European Union, disputes over judicial reform have led toThe 35 billion euro recovery fund has been frozen, agricultural policy differences continue to ferment, and climate stance differences may trigger economic and trade countermeasures. The historical baggage also constitutes a practical obstacle: historical memories such as the Warren incident constrain the development of Poland Ukraine relations, the Russian factor has always been an uncertain variable in security strategy, and the historical knots in German Polish relations limit the depth of strategic cooperation. What is more noteworthy is thatIntergenerational valuesThe rift between the digital generation and the conservative agenda continues to decline among young people in urban areas, and there is a clear deviation between the historical cognition of the digital generation and official narratives. This social cognitive differentiation may shake the social foundation of conservative politics.

Polish ChineseThe Shawwal Massacre Memorialstele

From a deeper perspective, the Naflotsky phenomenon reflects the revival of historical memory politics in the post Cold War era. He elevated the power of historical interpretation to the level of a core element of national sovereignty. This attempt challenges the dominant position of rational choice paradigm in modern political science in theory, but in practice it faces the eternal tension between historical narrative and practical interests. No matter what the outcome of this political experiment may be, the rule of Naflotsky will provide an important case for understanding 21st century nationalist politics. Its value lies not only in testing whether historical memory can be transformed into political momentum, but also in exploring the possible boundaries for small and medium-sized countries to achieve strategic autonomy in the game of great powers.

The answer to this question will not only determine Poland's future destiny, but may also provide a new perspective for understanding identity politics in contemporary international politics. In this sense, the political experiment being conducted in Poland has transcended national borders and become an important window for observing the political changes of our time.